Don't Show Again Yes, I would!

After a Merger, These 3 Inefficiencies Can Actually Be Assets


Strategic inefficiencies play a surprising role in the success of technology acquisitions. Research involving hundreds of organizations and interviews with executives reveals that certain inefficiencies in post-merger integration (PMI) can actually propel growth. Key inefficiencies identified include: mirror teams where staff from both companies work together, increasing complexity but enhancing integration; double incentives, offering additional rewards post-merger to align goals at the cost of higher expenses; and co-location, prioritizing costly in-person meetings for better communication and relationship building. The study concludes that these short-term inefficiencies can lead to more effective long-term corporate growth, challenging the traditional focus on efficiency and redundancy reduction in corporate mergers and acquisitions.

Technology acquisitions — such as Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp, IBM’s acquisition of Redhat, or Broadcom’s acquisition of VMWare — are increasingly common and are particularly powerful for propelling growth. They account for approximately 20% of all acquisitions, help firms control nascent markets, pursue strategic renewal, gain access to new knowledge, and advance technological capabilities.




Source Link Website

See also  Bankrupt EV startup Arrival sold its assets to Canoo
Share:

lisa nichols

My lisa Nichols is an accomplished article writer with a flair for crafting engaging and informative content. With a deep curiosity for various subjects and a dedication to thorough research, lisa Nichols brings a unique blend of creativity and accuracy to every piece

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *